Peer Review Process

Transparent, structured, and integrity‑focused review workflow.

Home / Editorial / Peer Review

Workflow Stages

  1. Submission & administrative screening
  2. Desk assessment by subject editor
  3. Reviewer invitation & conflict checks
  4. Double‑blind external evaluation
  5. Consolidated decision (accept / minor / major / reject)
  6. Revision tracking & resubmission cycles
  7. Technical checks (figures, references, plagiarism)
  8. Final approval & production handoff

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are chosen for domain expertise, methodological competence, and absence of conflicts. Diversity and geographical balance are prioritized.

Transparency Measures

  • Structured review forms & scoring rubric
  • ORCID‑linked reviewer acknowledgment (opt‑in)
  • Ethical compliance checklist per submission
  • Data availability & reproducibility statements